C.R.A.P. NOW
C.R.A.P.  Now



​
Comprehensive Reform of




​ American Politics

Click to sign petition for Democrats to Stand Up and Biden to step down: www.Change.org/JoeStepDown

Click to sign petition for House/Senate Republicans to Stand Up to Trump: www.Change.org/GOPStandUp

Fact Check Daily Videos, The Final Countdown: Videos Page

RSS Feed

  • Currents
  • Platform
  • Facts
  • Videos
  • Cartoons
  • PTP - Peaceful Transition of Power
  • Voter Bill of Rights
  • Healthcare
  • Topics
  • About

7/21/2024

SB Independent, 7-20-24: Dems Step Up, Joe Stand Down

0 Comments

Read Now
 

www.independent.com/2024/07/20/choose-country-over-party

I’ve continually called for Republicans to stand up against Trump and choose country over party. I’m now asking the same of Joe Biden, influential Democrats, and the rest of us. Do the right thing for the country — withdraw your nomination and endorse Kamala Harris as the Democrat nominee. Biden is fighting this decision but has begrudgingly conceded to consider it if there were a health issue, the American people support it, or if he is told he can’t win — check, check and check.

It’s the right thing to do; he is undeniably not at full capacity, has deteriorated while in office, and will continue declining. For partisans, Republicans have massive positive momentum over the past few weeks — two thirds support their candidate, while two-thirds of Democrats do not support Biden. For nonpartisans — it’s the right thing to do for integrity and for the country.

Aging is irreversible. It is a blessing to enjoy with the ones you love, not a condition to impose on the U.S. voting population. Biden’s diminished physical and mental faculties will continue to decline for the next 4.5 years. Deteriorating presidents is not a new phenomenon in American history, but we do not need to add to that history.
​
Joe and the top-level Democrat establishment should show integrity — do the right thing, not the easy thing. Privately knowing the truth while publicly supporting the opposite is not integrity. Democrats now have the historic opportunity to make the principled stand that Republicans wouldn’t. Family, advisors, and handlers are enabling Biden, propping him up to make him feel like he owes the American public another term in office. A good friend is the one who challenges bad decisions; Jill and others Joe listens to need to be that good friend. This is an opportunity for Democrats to do the principled thing rather than the expedient thing, in stark contrast to Republicans over last eight years. History will show the difference, but only if people stand up on principle and only if Joe makes the right decision.

Share

0 Comments

7/11/2024

#DemsStandup, Joe Step Down (Long Version)

0 Comments

Read Now
 
I’ve continually called for Republicans to stand up against Trump and choose Country Over Party. I’m now asking the same of Joe Biden, influential Democrats, and the rest of us. Do the right thing for the country — withdraw your nomination and endorse Kamala Harris as the Democrat nominee. Biden is fighting this decision but has begrudgingly conceded to consider it if there were a health issue, the American people support it, or if he is told he can’t win — check, check and check. 

It’s the right thing to do; he is undeniably not at full capacity, has deteriorated while in office, and will continue declining. For partisans, Republicans have massive positive momentum over the past few weeks - two thirds support their candidate, while two thirds of Democrats do not support Biden. For non partisans — it’s the right thing to do, for integrity and for the country.

This is not about Biden/Trump, this is about right and wrong. The decision should have been made early in the presidency, and certainly a year ago when there was a chance for competitive primaries. But institutional politics and the desire for continued power prevented that. Biden ironically cloaks this desire in a Trumpian view that “I alone can fix it.” But Biden has a good chance to lose and, furthermore, is part of a team that can nominate a capable reasonably aged candidate that can win and have a successful presidency. It’s human nature to push back against calls to step down; but we are electing a president, not a child.

Aging is irreversible. It’s is a blessing and privilege that should be enjoyed with the ones you love, not a condition to impose on the U.S. voting population and the world at large. Biden is still competent, but his body and mental faculties have demonstrably diminished. This will continue and is not just an issue for the next week or month — it is for the next 4.5 years. Simply put, it ain’t good and it’s gettin’ worse. Deteriorating presidents is not a new phenomenon in American history. Many have declined while in office — Woodrow Wilson’s wife ran the presidency for nearly two years after a stroke in 1919, and FDR was nominated in 1944 despite Democrats knowing he would likely not survive the term (he died several months after being inaugurated). We do not need to add to that history.

Democrats are shocked at the ability of good people to publicly support the continual lies, anti-democratic activities, and self-serving reality of Trump in the interest of partisan politics. They criticize Republicans for not taking a principled stand against an historically flawed person. They are now faced with a similar situation and have an opportunity to “walk the walk” and be vocal about the need for Biden to step down. 

Joe and the top-level Democrat establishment — Pelosi, Schumer, Jeffries, and other influential Democrat leaders — should show integrity. Integrity is doing the right thing, not the easy thing. Privately knowing the truth while publicly supporting the opposite is not integrity. America stood by for eight years watching enabling Republicans do the expedient thing — publicly support a compulsive-lying, narcissistic candidate while privately either understanding his historic flaws or choosing to look past them. Democrats now have the historic opportunity to make the principled stand that Republicans wouldn’t. It may not yield a win in November, but it is the right thing to do.

Close family, advisors, and handlers should be ashamed of covering up the deterioration of Biden’s condition by propping him up and helping him feel like he owes the American public another term in office. They presumably feel like protectors but are actually enablers. A good friend isn’t the yes-man; it’s the one who challenges bad decisions. Jill and other close advisors Joe listens to need to be that good friend.

This is an opportunity for Democrats to do the principled thing rather than the expedient thing, in stark contrast to Republicans over last eight years. History will show the difference, but only if people stand up on principle and ONLY if Joe makes the right decision.

Share

0 Comments

2/15/2021

Fox News/GOP Impeachment Misinformation and What About-isms

0 Comments

Read Now
 
Fox News/GOP Impeachment Misinformation and What About-isms (2-15-21)Video Link: https://youtu.be/d9fJVPdKRiU
From 2-10-21 Sean Hannity Episode (Devin Nunes, Jim Jordan, Jeanine Pirro, Mark Levin)
Hannity Themes
  1. Unconstitutional because Trump private citizen.
    1. Constitutional to impeach sitting president. 
    2. McConnell denied speedy trial while in office.
    3. Most constitutional scholars agree it is constitutional
    4. Senate voted it is constitutional.
  2. It was preplanned so couldn’t incite it.
    1. Can incite something that is preplanned.
    2. Months of election misinformation.
    3. Rhetoric pre January 6th invited supporters, incited them, and motivated them to prevent/overturn Congressional vote counting procedure.
  3. Insurrectionist language of left
    1. Example of “What About-ism”
    2. Classic, unfortunate Fox News tactic
    3. None of the “what about” examples motivated insurrection in the Capitol, deaths/injuries, or attempt to overturn election results.

Jordan’s 4 Principles (enjoy the irony)
  1. Unconstitutional. See before.
  2. No due process.
    1. Constitution provides no rules.
    2. Both teams agreed to rules.
    3. Prosecution provided thoroughly presented evidence.
  3. Grave harm to 1st amendment.
    1. No harm to 1st amendment.
    2. Trump speech not curtailed.
    3. 1st amendment doesn’t protect illegal action (e.g., threats to someone’s safety, inciting a riot)
    4. 1st amendment is not an element of the impeachment case
    5. 144 constitutional/legal scholars explained this in group letter
  4. Doesn’t unify the country.
    1. Inciting group that invaded capitol 1st time since 1812 doesn’t unify.
    2. Trump/enablers promote massive election misinformation & divisive actions, then when lose power they argue for unity over accountability.
    3. Unifying Principles: fact over fiction, integrity over partisanship, country over politics.
    4. You’re welcome.

Jordan’s 4 Facts
  1. Pre planned (see before)
  2. Pipe bombs found in advance
    1. Says this very enthusiastically, so MUST be legit??
  3. Capitol police asked for additional help.
    1. How is this a point?
  4. Trump said “peaceful and patriotic” in speech.
    1. Single statement re: peaceful vs. dozens of incendiary remarks (including other speakers).
    2. Statement early on.
    3. Trump also said he would join them on march to Capitol.
    4. Irresponsible to call for rally to overturn election results, then to use incendiary language to a group already inclined to violent actions.
    5. Examples: Peaceful 1x, stolen election 8x, take back country 2x, warriors 1x, false election claims 73, not going to take it 3x, weakness/strength 16x, fight 10x, suppression 6x, destruction 3x, Pence doing right thing 7x, fake news 12x, enemy of the people 2x.

What About-ism Examples
  1. Stacy Abrams: 2018 Governor candidate, not Trump on Jan 6th
  2. Hillary Clinton: 2016 Presidential candidate, not Trump on Jan 6th
  3. Nancy Pelosi: Speaker of the House who was a target of insurrection on Jan 6th
  4. Adam Schiff, Mueller Report: investigated Russian collusion, not Trump on Jan 6th
  5. Jamie Raskin & Eric Swallwell: House impeachment managers, not Trump on Jan 6th
  6. Chinese Spy and Shooter of Steve Scalise: how is this related to Trump on Jan 6th?

What About-ism Examples (cont.)
  1. People confronting Senators Paul, Hawley, Graham, McConnell
  2. Fox News recurring footage of burning buildings, violence of racial riots
  3. Language of the left and Kamala Harris statements are not inciting an insurrection of the Capitol or attempt to overturn a national election

Presidential Medal of Freedom
  • Highest civilian award.
  • For “an especially meritorious contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, world peace, cultural or other significant public or private endeavors."
  • No rules precluding a narcissistic president awarding Medal of Freedom to same-party politicians who support him blindly with rabid partisanship, falsely patriotic rhetoric, and complete absence of fact-based assertions.

Congratulations to Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan.

Recurring Lies about Democrats not Accepting 2016 Results
  • See following examples of them accepting election results.
  • Contrast against Trump who still hasn’t accepted results and prominent Republicans and Fox News pundits refusing to accept results until after January 6th.

Jeanine Pirro, Devin Nunes, Mark LevinIn video clip.

Share

0 Comments

1/20/2021

New Day

0 Comments

Read Now
 
This is a great day, a new day, an imperfect but glorious day. This day every 4 years for the past two centuries symbolizes the best of our democracy, PTP - the peaceful transition of power. For the first time since the 1800s, the outgoing president will not hand off the baton in this magnificent relay race. It’ll be left on the ground at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue for the new president to pick it up. But pick it up he shall, and move on we will (Yoda - 2021).


I’ve been at each inauguration for 20 years, as have all our kids at various points to celebrate this process no matter who we voted for. A single person’s Reality Refusal and a willingness of millions to support it created the most disruptive transition in our history and prevented public participation. But PTP survived, and this New Day is our opportunity to move forward.


The country and world will participate virtually. We’ll attend in person in another 4 years to honor the process and celebrate the newly elected president no matter who it is.


That’s what we do.

Share

0 Comments

12/3/2020

Trump Oval Office Election Fraud Misinformation

0 Comments

Read Now
 

Factcheck.org

Election Fraud Misinformation from Trump’s Oval Office Speech, 12-2-20

This speech includes much of the misinformation spread by his sons and his extended legal team (Giuliani, Powell, Wood, etc.). Public statements such as in this speech and Giuliani’s press conferences/hearings do not require facts or accuracy. Lawsuits do;  Trump’s extended legal team has lost 46 lawsuits (Washington Post, 12-4-20), and there has been no lawsuit victory involving evidence of voter fraud. Trump’s Oval Office speech is summarized below, and full details are in the fact check article.
  1. Overwhelming evidence of fraud. False. Of the nearly 50 lawsuits in court, none dealing with voter fraud prevailed, and judges have issued harsh statements in their rulings denouncing the lack of evidence. For example, the Pennsylvania ruling stated “...this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence.”
  2. There were no safeguards for mail-in ballots. False. All states using mail-in ballots have safeguards. For example. most states use bar codes on mail-in ballots matched to a specific person in the voter files; ballot envelopes require personal information, such as date of birth or driver’s license numbers; and signatures are required and matched against ones on file.
  3. Dominion Voting Systems switched votes. False. Based on HHS input, DOJ stated “we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.”
  4. Votes are counted in foreign countries. False. All votes in the U.S. are counted in the U.S.
  5. Computer voting systems were used to switch thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in Michigan. False. Antrim County information was incorrectly reported; this was quickly corrected. This was human error (not a software glitch) that “did not in any way, shape or form affect the official election results of Antrim County,”
  6. Republican poll observers were not allowed to view the counts. False. Observers from both parties were allowed across the country. In the Pennsylvania example, Trump’s lawyer admitted in court that observers were there.
  7. There were more votes than voters in Detroit. False. Half of the registered voters voted. There were out-of-balance precincts (i.e., differences between counted votes and number of people who voted), but the total for Detroit was 357. Such discrepancies, which aren’t unique to this election, regularly occur.
  8. Detroit poll workers counted ballots multiple times and duplicated ballots. False. The Wayne County legal ruling was the allegations were “not credible” and represented a misunderstanding of the ballot tabulation process.
  9. Georgia improperly checked signatures and also left signature checks out of the recount. False. Georgia election officials check signatures twice: once when a voter requests a mail-in ballot, and then again when the ballot is returned. Signature checks were not part of the hand recount, but this is not fraudulent. Once a signature is verified on the ballot’s outer envelope, the ballot itself is separated for counting to protect voter privacy.
  10. The number of rejected ballots in Georgia was substantially lower than the past. False. Trump is conflating the ballots rejected just for signature issues in this election with ballots rejected in past elections for all reasons — usually for arriving too late. The percentage of mail-in ballots rejected in Georgia due to signature issues this year was about the same as in the 2016 and 2018 general elections.
  11. Democrats in Pennsylvania were allowed to cure ballots but Republicans were not. False. All counties got the same guidance allowing voters to cast a provisional ballot on Election Day. Some counties notified voters, and some didn’t. But that inconsistency didn’t fall along partisan county lines according to the legal ruling: “... counties vary in implementing that guidance, but that is normal. Reasonable county-to-county variation is not discrimination.”
  12. Large vote dumps occurred in Michigan. False. A large uptick of about 140,000 votes for Biden was the result of a typo in unofficial results reported by Michigan’s Shiawassee County. The mistake was quickly corrected.
  13. A massive dump of votes late at night in Wisconsin caused Biden’s lead. False. Trump was ahead in Wisconsin at the end of the day on Nov. 3, but that was before many of the mail-in ballots were counted. State law prevented election officials from counting absentee ballots before polls opened on Election Day.
  14. Thousands of ballots found after election were for mostly from Trump voters. False. Almost 6,000 uncounted or unreported votes were discovered by officials during the hand recount. But those votes for Trump and Biden have since been included in the overall tallies and didn’t change the outcome (it reduced Biden’s lead).
  15. Issues with Pennsylvania mail-in ballots were evidence of fraud. False. These were just issues that were addressed and do not fare present fraud (one was cited by Trump’s legal team in a lawsuit, which was dismissed by a federal judge and upheld by the unanimous 3rd Circuit).
  16. In-person voters in Arizona had errors resulting in their votes not being counted. False. No witnesses for the Trump campaign could confirm that their votes had not been recorded, and the judge dismissed the campaign’s claims as moot and with prejudice, meaning the decision cannot be retried.
  17. Voter rolls are filled with illegal voters. False. Voter roll errors are not evidence of fraud unless someone actually votes illegally. Voting experts say that while the instances of voter fraud via mail-in ballot are more common than in-person voting fraud, the number of known cases is relatively small.
  18. A Wisconsin voter roll dispute involves 100,000 illegal voters. False. All those voters did was fail to respond within 30 days to a mailing saying it appeared they had moved and giving them the opportunity to continue their registration if they had not. There’s no evidence they voted illegally.
  19. It is statistically impossible for Trump to lose when down-ballot Republicans won. False. While Republicans fared better than polls suggested they would, it is not unusual in recent elections for House GOP candidates to fare better against their Democratic opponents than how the Republican presidential candidate performed. Election experts also attribute some of the disparity to “ballot roll-off,” which is when voters skip certain races.

Source: FactCheck.org

Share

0 Comments

11/21/2020

SIGN Petition for Republicans to Stand Up to Trump

0 Comments

Read Now
 
Please sign/share this nonpartisan grass-roots petition asking Republicans (House/Senate) to stand up to Trump: www.Change.org/GOPStandUp. There’s no time more important than now. He needs to hear from his own party.


Easy to do: click link, enter your info, select if you don’t want your info to show, and sign.


The President is using meritless claims to contest a legal/secure election and put our country in an unnecessary crisis, challenging our founding principle: Peaceful Transition of Power. (He can legally challenge results with merit-based legal claims until states certify in early December; that should be allowed of course.)


This is a nonpartisan effort, it’s a 1776 moment for people to sign up to a movement asking our elected Republican representatives to challenge something fundamentally wrong in our system.

Share

0 Comments

11/16/2020

Fact Check: Giuliani Election Fraud Misinformation (Nov 16)

0 Comments

Read Now
 
False/Unproven Election Fraud Allegations by Rudy Giuliani as of 11-16-20:
  1. Election software company (Dominion) has ties to Venezuela and China and is using software used to steal elections in other countries. False. The company says it is nonpartisan. “Dominion has no company ownership relationships with any member of the Pelosi family, the Feinstein family, or the Clinton Global Initiative, Smartmatic, Scytl, or any ties to Venezuela.”
  2. Dominion is “a radical-left company” and has a person who is “a big supporter of antifa ... and has written horrible things about the president.” False. There is no evidence that Dominion is “radical-left” or has connections to antifa, the anti-fascist political movement. There is no information on the specific employee.
  3. Dominion software “is done by a company called Smartmatic, a company that was founded by [Hugo] Chávez and by Chavez’s two allies, who still own it. And it’s been used to cheat in elections in South America.” Misleading. Smartmatic, an election technology company, was founded and incorporated in the United States in 2000 and is now headquartered in London. There is a long-ago corporate connection to Venezuela, according to news accounts in 2006. Smartmatic replaced Venezuela’s election machinery before a referendum that confirmed Chávez as president in August 2004, and the Venezuelan government made a $200,000 loan to another technology company owned by some of the same people as Smartmatic. With the money from its contracts with Venezuela, Smartmatic in 2005 bought Sequoia Voting Systems, which had contracts in 17 states. But it sold Sequoia in 2007 after an investigation was launched by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States into the company’s possible Venezuela ties. Dominion eventually purchased assets of Sequoia in 2010.
  4. Smartmatic chairman is a close business associated of George Soros. True, but irrelevant. Mark Malloch-Brown is chairman of SGO Corp., the parent company of Smartmatic. Malloch-Brown is also on the board of Soros’s Open Society Foundations, which makes grants to civil society groups. George Soros is a billionaire backer of liberal causes. Soros otherwise has no connection to Smartmatic.
  5. Smartmatic has methods for fixing elections “by calling a halt to the voting when you’re running too far behind” and “have done that in prior elections.” False. Giuliani has offered no evidence to back up this claim. In 2017, Smartmatic reported that the Venezuelan government reported a false turnout figure for a contested election, adding at least 1 million votes to the number. The company said the absence of election monitors from the opposition — which boycotted the election — allowed for the manipulation of turnout figures. The Venezuelan government, which needed a large turnout figure to lend legitimacy to the election, denied the numbers had been manipulated. The company stopped its work in Venezuela in 2018.
  6. ​Trump “was ahead by 800,000 votes in Pennsylvania. Impossible to catch up unless you’re cheating, and same thing in Michigan, Wisconsin. False. In all three states, absentee and early votes could not be counted until election night because of rules set by GOP-controlled legislatures. So in-person votes, which leaned Republican, were reported first. Just in Pennsylvania, more than 1.4 million votes still needed to be counted after midnight. Because these votes were overwhelmingly for Biden, Trump’s lead was wiped out as the hours ticked by.
  7. A witness in Michigan “was getting trained in how to cheat in September 2020.“ False. Wayne County Circuit Judge Timothy Kenny denied a request to stop canvassing and certification of the county’s election results, saying the witnesses’ “interpretation of events is incorrect and not credible.”​
  8. Someone brought in 100,000 ballots in Michigan at 4 in the morning when it was determined that Trump had a 120,000-vote lead. False. Wayne County Circuit Judge Timothy Kenny on Nov. 13 concluded that Carone’s “allegations are simply not credible.” The claim stems from a single affidavit filed by an alleged witness, Melissa Carone, a contract IT worker for Dominion. But Carone, who made a number of voter-fraud claims, does not make the conclusions that Giuliani makes. Carone simply says that food was brought in on two vans, but “I never saw any food coming out of the vans, coincidentally it was announced on the news that Michigan had found over 100,000 more ballots — not even two hours after the last van left.”

Source:
Washington Post Fact Checker

Share

0 Comments

11/14/2020

Fact Check: Election Fraud Misinformation (Nov 14)

0 Comments

Read Now
 
False/Unproven Election Fraud Allegations as of 11-14-20:
  1. A secret supercomputer was used to switch votes from Donald Trump to Joe Biden. False. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has flatly rejected such claims. CISA has said that safeguards — including auditable logs and software checks — used by states ensure accuracy in the vote totals. Election/computer experts provided examples of why the claim is not valid. Trump lawyers discussed on conservative media but refused to provide evidence to FactCheck.org, saying “stay tuned.”
  2. Trump Tweet: “REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” False. See response to #1. “There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised,” says a statement emailed to reporters Thursday by the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, a federal agency that oversees U.S. election security. “The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history.” Dominion Voting Systems said in a statement that it “denies claims about any vote switching or alleged software issues with our voting systems.” There have been only a “small handful” of issues that were the result of human error involving voting technology, not the software itself, said Eddie Perez, a voting technology expert at the OSET Institute, a nonpartisan election technology research and development nonprofit.
  3. Same claim as #1 and #2. False. According to USA Today, OAN’s Lilia Fifield made the claim on air, per a clip on Mediaite. Election systems across the country are found to have deleted millions of votes cast for President Trump," she said. "According to an unaudited analysis of data obtained from Edison Research, states using Dominion Voting Systems may have switched as many as 435,000 votes from President Trump to Joe Biden, and the author also finds another 2.7 million Trump votes appear to have been deleted by Dominion including almost one million truckloads in Pennsylvania alone." Trump and Donald Trump Jr. then magnified the claim. A national coalition announced Thursday that there is no evidence that any voting software deleted or changed votes in last week's election, per USA TODAY.
  4. Trump Tweet: “Report: Dominion deleted 2.7 million Trump votes nationwide. Data analysis finds 221,000 Pennsylvania votes switched from President Trump to Biden. 941,000 Trump votes deleted.” False. See response above. In addition, Dominion calls the claim from Trump that its machines deleted 941,000 votes for him in Pennsylvania alone "impossible." Dominion only serves 14 counties in the state, which produced a total of 1.3 million votes — 52%, or 676,000, of which went to Trump. That only leaves 624,000 other votes, fewer than what Trump claims were switched.
  5. A large number of votes in Michigan switched from Trump to Biden. False. The biggest example of a tabulation problem in the 2020 election involved a few thousand votes in Antrim County, Michigan, and was the result of human error, Perez said. It turned out Dominion was not to blame, according to the Michigan Department of State. “There was no malice, no fraud here, just human error,” County Clerk Sheryl Guy told The Associated Press. The tabulation error was corrected.
  6. A CNN video from election night is evidence of the supposed vote-stealing operation in action. False. The error was actually a simple mistake by a research firm that gathers results data for CNN and others; it wasn’t a change in the reporting by election officials. (Those vote tallies are unofficial tallies, not final, official results.) The mistake was corrected about an hour later.
  7. Trump Tweet: “The Consent Decree signed by the Georgia Secretary of State, with the approval of Governor @BrianKempGA, at the urging of @staceyabrams, makes it impossible to check & match signatures on ballots and envelopes, etc. They knew they were going to cheat. Must expose real signatures!” False. There is nothing in the consent decree that prevents Georgia election clerks from scrutinizing signatures. The legal settlement signed in March addresses accusations about a lack of statewide standards for judging signatures on absentee ballot envelopes. L. Lin Wood Jr. filed a federal lawsuit Friday questioning whether the secretary of state had the authority to require the process of signature verification outlined in the agreement. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, said that not only is it entirely possible to match signatures, but that the state requires it.

Sources:
FactCheck.org
AP Fact Check
USA Today Fact Check

Share

0 Comments

11/9/2020

Fact Check: Voter Fraud Misinformation (Nov 9)

0 Comments

Read Now
 
False/Unproven Voter Fraud Allegations as of 11-9-20

A glitch in the vote counting software used in Michigan led to thousands of ballots cast for Trump being counted for Biden. False. Michigan’s Secretary of State acknowledged a problem in one county where votes were initially incorrectly reported for Biden; this problem was quickly identified and corrected. "There is no evidence this user error occurred elsewhere in the state." This was human error, not a software glitch. 

Dead people voted in Pennsylvania. No evidence yet. This is a common allegation that is sometimes true but is usually a) a person dying after mailing a ballot or b) administrative list-matching error. There is 1 verified account in Allegheny County of a person’s mail-in ballot being sent after they died (the person’s wishes were to vote for Trump).

21,000 ballots were cast in the name of dead people in Pennsylvania. False. Plaintiff (Public Interest Legal Foundation) did not provide proof to the judge.

Dead people voted in Michigan. False. Michigan election officials called the rumors "misinformation" noting that votes from dead people are rejected.

A video of searches of Michigan’s Voter Information Center shows that dead residents voted. False. Video actually showed legitimate voters, and examples implying dead voters were proven wrong. The false claims were shared online with the hashtag #stopthesteal, which has been circulated in recent days to suggest that votes are being stolen from Trump.

Poll workers illegally filled in ballots in Pennsylvania. False. Video shows election workers transcribing votes from damaged ballots so they could be scanned and recorded.

Election workers in Delaware County stamped clean ballots as received and then filled them in. False. Livestream video was an election worker transcribing votes from damaged ballots to clean ballots. the video was cropped to remove the bipartisan observers watching over election workers from 6 feet away.

Poll workers stuffed ballots in Flint, Michigan. False. Video shows poll workers in Russia, not in the United States. It has been circulating online since March 19, 2018.

Ballots were suspiciously mishandled in Detroit, Michigan. False. The video is of a WXYZ-TV cameraman using the wagon to carry his heavy camera equipment.

Votes eliminated in Arizona and Michigan because people were made to use Sharpie pens to mark their ballots, causing tabulation machine to cancel the vote. False. Maricopa County (Arizona) Elections Department tweeted on Election Day that voting centers use Sharpies so that ink does not smudge when ballots are counted.

More mail-in ballots were counted in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania than were requested or sent. False. An inaccurate graphic on a local TV station briefly showed this but was quickly corrected. 

Wisconsin had more votes counted than people registered to vote. False. The number of registered voters listed in a viral tweet used the number from 2018. Registered voters in 2020 are a half million higher than in 2018.

Election officials in DeKalb County, Georgia, rejected 40,000 absentee ballots. False. Twitter users circulated false information. DeKalb County issued a statement: “Currently, there are approximately 200 ballots that need to be cured and each voter is being contacted.”

A map of voting in Michigan on election night showed a sudden increase of around 130,000 votes for Biden but none for Trump. Misleading. This map was shown, but it was a data entry error that was later corrected. The election monitoring website which created the map, said: "It was a simple error from a file created by the state that we ingested… the state noticed the error and produced an updated count." Matt Mackowiak, the user whose post was picked up by Trump, has deleted the tweet and apologized.

Trump alleged that Pennsylvania ballots counted after Election Day are being counted “... without any identification whatsoever.” False. Pennsylvania requires people voting in person to provide proof of identity if it is their first time voting at that precinct. That’s also required from from anyone registering for a mail-in ballot. Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State advised that ballots should not be counted if a name on a mail-in ballot can’t be verified, or if identification was not received. But such voters have six days after their ballot is received, but no later than Nov. 12, to show ID and have their vote count.

Trump alleged that in Pennsylvania “Democrats have gone to the State Supreme Court to try to ban our election observers very strongly.” False. Philadelphia officials appealed a state court ruling granting Trump’s observers closer access to the city’s vote-counters, saying they have provided access that complies with state law and contains necessary precautions in light of the pandemic.

Trump alleged “The officials overseeing the counting in Pennsylvania, all part of a corrupt Democrat machine." False. The counting of votes is run by counties, many of which are controlled by Republicans.

Sources:
FactCheck.org: https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/thin-allegations-of-dead-people-voting/
AP News: https://apnews.com/article/fraud-claims-aimed-trump-base-loyal-e1c3c5147d11a033fb43ebe66a29f7e8
AP News: https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ap-fact-check-pennsylvania-media-social-media-cffc1bf12660177b0c651f98054a3a76
BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54811410
Philadelphia Inquirer: https://www.inquirer.com/news/trump-fact-check-pennsylvania-ballot-philadelphia-president-20201105.html
​

Share

0 Comments

11/7/2020

Fact Check: Trump Post-Election Misinformation

0 Comments

Read Now
 
Post-Election Fact Check Summary (www.CRAPNow.org/Facts):
  1. Counting illegal ballots. False. No evidence provided yet of systemic problems in voting or counting (including illegal ballots).
  2. PA not allowing count observers. False. Trump lawyers admitted in court that observers allowed. Court case ruled in Trump’s favor, but only to allow observers to be closer to counters.
  3. MI not allowing count observers in Detroit. False. Hundreds of observers from both parties allowed in Detroit.
  4. PA Democrats allowed late ballots. False. State law allows (and state Supreme Court upheld) votes postmarked on Election Day to be counted within 3 days. Trump team provided no evidence of unallowable ballots received late.
  5. GA election apparatus run by Democrats. False (and irrelevant). GA Sec of State is Republican.
  6. GA ballots received after Election Day. Misleading. Military ballots received after Election Day are valid (confirmed by GA court).
  7. Trump won if discount illegal votes. False. Trump team has provided no evidence of large-scale illegal voting in swing states.
  8. Were winning in swing states until numbers miraculously changed. False. They were winning based on initial votes counted/reported in GA/MI/PA/WI, but that changed as more votes counted/reported.

Sources:
  • AP News Fact Check​

Share

0 Comments
<<Previous
Details

    Author

    Citizen wanting to eliminate partisan politics and improve U.S. political system.

    ​[email protected]

    Archives

    July 2024
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    August 2020
    January 2020
    November 2016
    October 2016

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Currents
  • Platform
  • Facts
  • Videos
  • Cartoons
  • PTP - Peaceful Transition of Power
  • Voter Bill of Rights
  • Healthcare
  • Topics
  • About